BLOG: Cap-and-Trade and Environmental Justice: A Study of California’s RECLAIM Program

By Aidan Acosta, Middlebury College

BLOG. Cap-and-trade has been shown by previous studies to be at least as effective as prescriptive regulation at reducing air pollution. Because cap-and-trade is more flexible for facilities than control- based regulations, it has gained important political support. However, regulators must ensure that the dispersion of emissions that is dictated by the market is environmentally just in order for cap-and-trade to be a viable solution. I investigate the changes in dispersion patterns resulting from the implementation and operation of Southern California’s RECLAIM program between 1994 – 2010 using a difference-in-difference model. My results demonstrate that RECLAIM was equally effective as the counterfactual command- and-control regime. With regard to race, I find suggestive evidence that the program led to a reordering of emissions whereby Blacks benefitted, while Hispanics and other races lost out, relative to Whites. With regard to income, I find evidence that the lowest- income group benefitted, while the middle-income group lost out, relative to the highest income group.

Read the full paper here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s